Kirk Shooter was Member of Spain's National Police, Claims Whistleblower

Charlie Kirk was not murdered by a disgruntled ex-Mormon, claims a whistleblower with ties to Spain's National Police force. According to the whistleblower, a sharpshooter from Madrid was personally selected to fly to Utah and liquidate Mr. Kirk due to him having come into the possession of documents linking former King Juan Carlos to Jeffrey Epstein. 

Spaniard covering for Catholic monarchy.

The whistleblower, fearing for his life, pointed out discrepancies between features of the sharpshooter captured on security footage and of Tyler Robinson, the patsy handed over by a government terrified of losing its military bases in the South of Spain. 

"He has a very skinny fit, tan skin, dark hair, walks with a Spanish military cadence," claimed the whistleblower in regards to the man captured on video fleeing after Charlie Kirk was shot. "This man was Spanish and acting on direct orders of King Juan Carlos."

The whistleblower noted that the security footage shows the suspect running with his hands in his pockets; an unusual but telling detail. “That isn’t panic,” he said. “That’s composure. Spaniards, especially those with military training, are known for maintaining a compact, controlled posture under pressure. He doesn’t flail, he doesn’t stumble. He moves with the discipline of someone drilled to keep his body steady, even in flight.”

According to the whistleblower, this posture alone is enough to cast doubt on the official story. “No ordinary Utah civilian moves like that,” he claimed.

The message has been unmistakable. According to the whistleblower, the treatment of the Kirk case is intended as a warning: anyone pursuing the Catholic monarch’s alleged ties to abuse networks should think twice.

“This wasn’t just about silencing one man,” the source said. “It was about showing what happens if you get too close. You publish, you investigate, you put yourself at risk.”

Reporters who have touched on the subject describe sudden withdrawals of cooperation from sources, unexplained legal pressure, and the quiet collapse of leads that once seemed promising. The result, critics argue, is a chilling effect: a story too dangerous for most journalists to chase.